In
the XIX century Africa has been seen as a continent to conquer and
exploit. It was considered as nobody's home and the white man's
burden was to invade and rule over territories and aborigines,
according to the principle “divide et impera”. After the process
of decolonisation, borders haven't changed and several ethnic groups
coexist in many African states. This is the case of Kenya with 42
ethnic groups. Bantu (67%) represents the majority, followed by
Nilotic (30%), Kikuyu (22%), Luhya (14), Luo (13%), Kalenjin (12%),
Kamba (11%), Kisii (6%), Meru (6%), other African (15%), and non
African (1%).
This
diversity has repercussions also in social aspects such as religion
and language. Apart from English and Swahili, which are the two
official languages, different ethnic groups speak their mother
tongues, and Ethnologue reports 69 languages spoken in Kenya. Most
belong to two broad linguistic families: Niger-Congo(Bantu
branch)
and Nilo-Saharan
(Nilotic
branch),
spoken by the country's Bantu and Nilotic populations, respectively.
The Cushitic and Arab ethnic minorities speak languages belonging to
the separate Afro-Asiatic
family,
with the Hindustani and European residents speaking languages from
the Indo-European
phylum.
As
far as religion is concerned, Christianity was spread by Portuguese
colonist and nowadays is the most professed religion, followed by
Baha'i, Hinduism, Islam, traditional African religions, based on
animism and magic. Although traditional beliefs has been reduced to
the individual sphere, they affect social life still now with dances
and rites. There is also a percentage of atheists.
On
this topic I found very interesting this article:
It
analyses the correlation between ethnicity and state, showing how the
former is exploited in order to get the power. For instance,
President Kenyatta based his campaign on the frustration of Kikuyu,
while his successor was sensitive toward his ethnic group, Kalenjin.
In
this case the European motto “unity
in diversity” is
a provocation. Unity is the result of the colonisation process, and
ethnic groups were forced to live together in a totally artificial
new state. But now that Kenya has gained its independence, ethnic
groups are in conflict, power has been taken by élites that stress
the diversity between minorities instead of trying to grow as a
nation thanks to this cultural richness. What do you think about it?
Is coexistence possible or because of the “artificial birth” of
Kenya it will always be poisoned by violence?
SOURCES: